In Europe, rising temperatures and climate changes happen faster than in any other part of the world concludes a new report issued by the European Environmental Agency
Over the past 100 years, the average global temperature has increased by roughly 0.7ºC, as the European average temperature has increased by 0/95ºC during the same period. The average global temperature is expected to rise by 1.4 to 5.8ºC during the next 100 years, while the expected rise in temperature in Europe is calculated to be from 2.0 to 6.3ºC during the same time frame. The temperature is currently increasing at a rate of about 0.2ºC a decade.
Glaciologists believe that an increase of 2.7ºC will initiate melting of the ice on Greenland.
Strategies to handle the climatic challenges
The time it takes for CO2—identified by scientists as one of the chief contributors to global warming—to pass through the atmosphere varies widely, but with significant impact.
It can take from 5 to 200 years to pass through the atmosphere, with an average of about 100 years. This means that CO2 emission produced 50 years ago still linger in the atmosphere today. It also means that current emissions wont loose their deleterious effect until year 2104. Even though drastic measures to reduce climate emissions have been taken in recent years, climate change is impossible to prevent. The EEA report thus urges Europe to develop strategies to cope with the coming climatic challenges.
The report also suggests several drafts for adaptations against climate change that can be implemented quickly, and are also within the budget constraints of European countries. The EEA believes these adaptations should be initiated in co-operation with the European market. However, this process will have to conquer a widespread myth in the European market that implies that climate solutions are expensive, and that inaction is profitable.
Lack of action will prove expensive
If fact, the EEA report point out, the opposites is true. To ignore obvious warnings, the report argues, will prove very expensive in the long run. The average annual number of climate-related disasters during the 1990s was twice as large as the annual average of the 80s.
The financial burden of dealing with the consequence of these disasters was more than $11 billion a year, according to EEAs report. The drought of 2003 caused the farmers across southern parts of Europe to lose 30 percent of their crops. This equals an income loss of 10 billion. The human costs of the drought were great as well: More than 10,000 people died from heat-related illness in France alone. Insurance companies expect the expenses related to climate disasters to double every decade in coming years. During the coming decade, annual global expenses are expected to rise to as high as $150 billion.
No more cold winters
By the year of 2080, cold winters in Europe are expected to disappear completely, according to the EEA report. This may seem a positive development for sun-loving Scandinavians, but cold winters are, among other things, important for preventing several kinds of diseases and household pests, the report says.
Loss of soil
The natural rate of soil formation is between 0.1 and 10 tonnes per hectare per year. In this slow creation of soil, a loss of more than 1 tonnes per hectare per year is considered irreversible within a timeframe of 50 to 100 years, the report says. In Europe, losses as large as 20 to 40 tonnes per hectare of soil have been measured during single storms. Extreme cases show losses as large as 100 tonnes per hectare. In parts of the Mediterranean region, the annual soil erosion has reached an irreversible level. In some cases, the erosion has stopped completely because, the report indicates, there is no more soil to erode.
Warm, dry summers lead to dry and infertile fields. It also causes more water to enter the atmosphere from oceans and lakes, which in turn results in more storms. When dried-out and vulnerable soil is hit by intense rain, the risk of increased erosion and loss of soil increases greatly.
The great flood that struck 11 European countries in 2002, caused more than 12 billion Euro worth of damages, and took 80 lives. In comparison, the total costs of the floods occurring between 1991 and 1995 were around 100 billion Euro.
The report from the EEA presents a great deal of evidence proving that climate changes are already occurring, and that that they have large scale consequences. The changing climate is a danger to the economy, to human life and to ecosystems all over Europe.
Long term effects
EEA Director Jacqueline McGlade said in a general statement from the environmental agency that Europe must continue its leading role in reducing global emissions of climate gases. However, the report emphasises the need for solutions, both nationally and locally, to adapt to the changing climate. She also predicts that the phenomenon will have a strong effect on both society and environment in the coming century.
The Kyoto protocol is seen as a first step in the right direction to attempt to reverse the negative climactic trend. During the protocols first period, which will be completed in 2012, the contributing countries have agreed to reduce the emissions of 6 climate gases by percent. However, numbers from the UN climate board, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, show that the cuts needed in these gasses to reverse the effect are between 65 and 80 percent.
So far, 123 countries, including all the members of the EU, have signed the agreement. However, the country responsible for the biggest emissions of climate gases, the United States, has not ratified the important protocol. Because of this, if the protocol is to have the desired effect, Russian needs to ratify it—a long shot given the administration of Vladimir Putins push for Russias industrial growth.
These are some of the climate-related effects now or in the future, based on the EEA report:
—Almost two out of three catastrophes since the 1980s have been caused by flood, storms, drought or heat waves.
—The annual number of floods in Europe, and the number of people affected by them, is increasing. With climate change, the frequency and intensity of floods is expected to increase.
—Climate changes during the last 30 years have led to a decrease in the number of species of plants in Europe, even in mountains. As habitats shrink or disappear, it is likely that several animal species will with them.
—Glaciers in eight of Europes nine Glacial areas are dissolving. European glaciers have not been this small in 5000 years.
—Ocean levels in Europe have increased by 0.8 to 3.0 millimetres annually for the last 100 years. This ocean rise is expected to double or even quadruple during the next 100 years.
Impact
A study of meteorological records by the Indian government showed that average temperature across the country increased by 0.4°C through the 20th century, whilst sea levels rose by 10-25cm.
These trends are predicted with a high degree of confidence to continue and accelerate during the current century. Temperature has a direct impact on crop yields - India’s most respected plant scientist, Professor M.S.Swaminathan, estimates that a one degree Celsius rise in temperature will reduce the wheat growing season by a week.
Studies suggest that a one metre rise in sea level would displace over 7 million people. Three of the world’s major cities – Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai – must contemplate this risk. Over 60 million people living in low-lying areas along the country’s vast coastline may experience difficulties as aquifers become degraded by saline intrusion.
The indirect impact of rising temperatures on rainfall is more difficult to predict. High resolution climate models for India remain embryonic, a shortcoming of especial relevance for a country whose climate ranges from the Rajasthan desert to the humid sub-tropical states of South India.
The broad expectation is for fewer wet days but more intense rainfall, implying a shorter monsoon with heightened risk of floods and drought. The future may have been glimpsed in the exceptional Bihar floods of 2008 and in the faliure of 2009 mansoon.
The incidence of cyclones is also the subject of uncertainty but the risk of increased intensity is regarded as high. The bulge of population in coastal regions is such that 370 million people in India experience one or more cyclones each year.
Much attention focuses on the observed retreat of Himalayan glaciers, the source region for India’s three major rivers. As the science of glacier melt develops, the working assumption is that the rivers will experience 2-3 decades of greater flood risk, with diminishing summer flows in the longer term. Over 500 million people live in the catchments of the Ganges and Indus rivers.
Adaptation
India’s National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) published in 2008 betrays the broader dilemmas of the country’s economic management. India is the world's 4th largest emitter of greenhouse gases, yet the extent of poverty and dependence on agriculture is such that the country’s vulnerability to climate change is high and its adaptive capacity very weak.
The Action Plan juggles the considerable humanitarian risk with the need for greater efficiency in the use of energy. It proposes eight “national missions” covering national priorities with relevant government ministries tasked with advancing implementation plans.
The apparent exclusion of coastal vulnerability from these missions is rectified in two high level adaptation initiatives supported by the World Bank. The Integrated Coastal Zone Management Project will assist Indian states in building capacity for adaptation to rising sea levels – for example, through mangrove plantation and regeneration of coral reefs.
The National Cyclone Risk Mitigation Program aims to improve the resilience of coastal communities to the threat of extreme storms and tidal surge. This will include the construction of shelters and installation of early warning systems, similar to those pioneered in Bangladesh.
These top-down initiatives will have little resonance for poor farmers coping with unfamiliar patterns of rainfall. Their interests in adaptation are likely to be dominated by soil conservation, water harvesting and its optimum application for crop irrigation.
Groundwater management assumes particular importance as the nature of its recharge smoothes out the effect of variable rainfall. The search for seed varieties resistant to drought, flooding and salinity is already under way in research institutes.
The NAPCC recognises that climate adaptation is served by accelerating conventional human development as well as resource management. Indeed its claims that the government is already spending over 2.5% of GDP on climate change adaptation may simply reflect the relabeling of existing rural development programmes.
Electricity Access
The government’s State of Environment Report 2009 concedes that “600 million Indians have no access to electricity”, more than half of the population. Most large cities boast universal 24-hour coverage but supplies everywhere are prone to interruption, especially in peak summer months. Millions of slum dwellings are connected through haphazard and unsafe improvisation.
The drive towards rural electrification rests with the Rajiv Gandhi Grameen Vidyutikaran Yojana, a plan of lofty ideals, 90% funded by central government. It absorbs all previous initiatives in a goal to achieve universal electrification by 2012, including free connections for BPL households.
The programme’s launch in 2005 quantified the task as connecting 78 million households in 125,000 villages. Government progress reports suggest that the programme is about one third of the way to completion.
There are 10,000 remote villages that lie beyond the reach of the Rajiv Gandhi plan. These should benefit from India’s solar mission, currently the most advanced of the eight programmes of the NAPCC. Armed with an initial budget allocation of $900 million, the mission plans a mix of major solar plants and micro-installations of household lighting systems.
Environmental groups support such moves towards decentralised renewables. Large power projects, especially hydro, have a poor reputation for human and environmental impact in India and experience increasingly hostile public protest.
Videos
Links
1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change
2) http://www.indiaclimateportal.org/how-climate-change-affects-india



